If anyone does do a FAQ - here is an example.
ALL THESE COORDINATES refer to ONE SINGLE SPOT. It's near the corner of Cable Street and Oriental Parade.
It just happens to be one reasonably obvious reference spot on a tracklog I had in Wellington:
WGS 84S41.29248 E174.78524
S41 17.549 E174 47.114
S41 17 33 E174 47 07
Now to take my own advice, and punctuate it correctly:

S41.29248° E174.78524°
S41° 17.549' E174° 47.114'
S41° 17' 33" E174° 47' 07"
NZGD 1949S41.29421° E174.78506°
S41° 17.652' E174° 47.104'
S41° 17' 39" E174° 47' 06"
or - if you want to be a bit more precise:
S41° 17' 39.1" E174° 47' 06.2"
NZMGE26
59502 N59
88949
NZMS 260 sheet referenceR27
595889NZTME1749478 N5427236
UTM60 G 314555 5426408
Note: Both NZMG and NZMS 260 sheet references are GD49
BY DEFINITION. That's why they are less prone to confusion.
NZTM (and UTM ) are WGS84 (almost

)
BY DEFINITION. We haven't seen much use of NZTM so far, but when the new LINZ maps come out, that's what they will have on them.
The colours in the NZMG and the sheet reference are the bits that are exactly the same in both.
In general, UTM shouldn't be used, as it is not optimised for our country. Use NZTM instead.
Hopefully I've got my NZMG/NZMS260 terminology correct. I never use it myself.
Please let me know if you spot any errors.