As Garmin do not provide the ability in the GPS to have a custom prefix added to the waypoint name, is it possible to have the prefix added when importing the waypoints into a computer programme?
Ideally MapSource or BaseCamp would do that while importing. Thanks for any leads to programmes that will prefix during waypoint import - or make it easy to prefix a bulk lot of waypoint names immediately after import.
Every day around NZ there are pest control contractors making hundreds of waypoints a day using the sequential number waypoint feature and just pressing the "Mark" button to mark a waypoint with minimum waste of time.
However you can imagine the difficult post processing workload when several field workers return to the office to upload their waypoints to the computer as there are many duplicate waypoint names.
I've asked Garmin Support to consider an addition in the GPS Setup area with a separate "Custom Waypoint" menu which would include the ability to add an automated prefix to every waypoint.
For example, Ben would set up his GPS so each time he "Marked" a waypoint the GPS would record the names sequentially like this:
Ben 001
Ben 002
Ben 003 etc etc to say, by the end of the day, Ben 427
The GPS (depending on model) is capable of storing up to 2,000 waypoints (4 digits) and up to 14 to18 characters in the waypoint name so allowing a custom prefix of up to be up to 14 characters should be ample. It would also be easy for the Garmin programmers to add the ability to specify the number of leading zeros in the sequential number. For example:
GarminSupport 0001
GarminSupport 0002 etc etc
GarminSupport 1999
Another easy option on a custom waypoint menu would be to be able to set the starting number (eg, 0428) so they could carry on from where they left off yesterday even though all the waypoints have been uploaded and deleted from the GPS - the waypoint numbering would normally start from 001 again .
At present the only method the field workers have of prefixing each waypoint is to manually enter their name and then the sequential number - this is not at all practical as it is very time consuming, very prone to error and increases the wear on the buttons / screen in often trying environmental conditions.


